Hi honey,
I am having a lazy Sunday rendezvous with Sarah. I thought it will be *[] (nice) to loop you in.
Nothing much, just a carry-forward discussion we had on the topic of truth.
* Sarah feels the same way too.
---------------------------------------------
I was a bit groggy when I did my walk this morning. But when I burst into a sprint, I knew I had it in me. This flu is only a neck-up issue. Neck-down I am OK. Hence I will proceed with my One Minute Per Hour Exercise + Kettlebell Core.
------------------------------------------------
What is Truth? There is no absolute truth except mathematics. Even that some people refute the statement. So let's say there is no truth. What do we have to work with? None other than models to support our beliefs. That is not the truth, that is just perspectives and opinions.
Don't get me wrong. The models may be accurate. However, to say a model is an absolute truth is like saying all ice creams are cold. They're bound to be anomalies. As long as there are anomalies, there cannot be absoluteness.
Take your pick. Either you say that the only absolute is mathematics or you say there is *[] (no) truth whatsoever.
* Ahah! Precisely, there is no truth. There are only models. You too are becoming a magician, Sarah.
---------------------------------------------------
OK, now we are making progress. Let's now look at models, shall we? Let's go straight to the biggest model that we had conceived. The Hexagon Superverse.
As far as models are concerned, that is a very good model:
Imagine six Troca Shells pivoting on the same axis much like a bouquet of flowers. Now *i[t] (is) that not a better model?
* Now you are seeing things more clearly yeah?
Rightfully there are 3 Superverses because we have to account for both the positive and negative. So if we simplify, we have 3 adjoining croissants.
Dan Falk talked about a Universe on a T-shirt. I say we have a Superverse on a Triquetra locket.
------------------------------------------
What say you, Sarah? Is this not one of those maths without numbers? Didn't we just simplify a complex model?
From here on I simply want to indulge in my thoughts. Like now I realized the 3 crescents are possibly the Triquetra as well.
That's what's good about dealing with models. You can keep on experimenting until you are happy with the outcome. Certainly, I experimented a lot with the models I constructed. That's the fun *pa[s]t (part) about it. I have to say, the model I am most fond of is Al Araf 7:7. I look at it at least **on[]e (once) in the morning and **on[]e (once) before I go to bed,
* I'm glad you are having fun darling,
** Same goes to you too huh?
---------------------------------------------
Imagine, there are people who only deal with models throughout their lives People like Ancel Keys were one such personality. He made it big time. Only after 3 decades do people realized that his model is flawed.
That is just one example, Sarah. What about the models Trump introduced? What about the Monetary Policy? What about the Agriculture Policy? What about the Military Policy?
Remember, there is no absolute truth, just perspective.
That is why we need to address the issue at the core.
The heart of the matter is the heart. If the heart is good the person is good. Both emotionally and physically.
I used to think that for me to be a good runner I need a pair of good legs and lungs. Only recently that I discovered that I also need a strong heart.
Another realization that I discovered was an emotionally good heart requires a healthy physical heart. There is no separation between the two. A physically healthy person is also an emotionally healthy person too.
mm
No comments:
Post a Comment